Similarly, if he must permit something per an emergency, he must clarify his reason for that particular case
Just as a rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not esatto forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if verso rabbi must forbid something merely because of a question of law, because of a custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not esatto establish an erroneous precedent.
Nevertheless, it is forbidden for a city to split into two congregations primarily because of per dispute over law or practice
Verso rabbi should be careful not to render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead onesto erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only in the case of a scholar, and which may not be taught esatto the ignorant.
When per rabbi renders verso decision durante per case per which there are mai clear precedents, he must strive sicuro bring as many proofs as possible…
When verso rabbi renders a decision sopra a question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when verso rabbi decides on verso case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.
Since the initial decision renders the subject of verso case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by a greater sage or by a majority rule.
An erroneous decision cannot render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if verso second rabbi is able to esibizione that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.
Similarly, per decision that is retracted with good reason does not render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per second rabbi is able puro determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi sicuro retract his decision and permit the case sopra question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for verso rabbi onesto reverse even his own decision…
Con order sicuro prevent controversy, one should not present verso case before a rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.
One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision preciso be erroneous
Although the Torah demands verso excretion degree of uniformity per practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions in minor questions of Torah law.
However, where there is giammai geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable sicuro be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within a solo community, the Torah requires per high degree of uniformity con religious practice. Con mai case should it be made puro appear that there is more than one Torah.
It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden esatto mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited preciso mutilate the https://datingranking.net/it/fastflirting-review body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Puro do so is onesto disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.
It is therefore forbidden for members of per celibe congregation sicuro form factions, each following per different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for verso scapolo rabbinical breviligne esatto issue per split decision.
However, where verso city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical athletique, the following of each one is counted as a separate community, and each one may follow different practices.